Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
webinar_2021-03 [2021/03/16 14:44] – [Graphical user interface] new screenshot of gui maly | webinar_2021-03 [2021/03/24 10:09] (current) – video maly | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
====== PAIREF webinar ====== | ====== PAIREF webinar ====== | ||
- | 23 Mar 2021, 3pm (CET) | + | 23 Mar 2021, 3pm (CET) |
- | | + | === IMPORTANT: Please install PAIREF and download data before the webinar (instructions below). === |
+ | |||
+ | | ||
- Installation of //PAIREF// for CCP4 and PHENIX users. | - Installation of //PAIREF// for CCP4 and PHENIX users. | ||
- Short tutorial. [[https:// | - Short tutorial. [[https:// | ||
- Discussion. | - Discussion. | ||
- | ===== Tutorial ===== | + | [[https:// |
- | ==== Install PAIREF - before | + | ==== Video recording from the webinar |
+ | |||
+ | [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Tutorial ===== | ||
- | === Please install | + | ==== PAIREF installation: |
Althought //PAIREF// has been developed to be installed easily, atypical computer setting can cause problems sometimes. Feel free to contact us via email ([[martin.maly@fjfi.cvut.cz]]) and we will help you. | Althought //PAIREF// has been developed to be installed easily, atypical computer setting can cause problems sometimes. Feel free to contact us via email ([[martin.maly@fjfi.cvut.cz]]) and we will help you. | ||
Line 23: | Line 30: | ||
{{: | {{: | ||
- | Now execute the following | + | Now execute the following |
- | < | + | < |
+ | ccp4-python -m ensurepip --user | ||
+ | ccp4-python -m pip install pairef --no-deps | ||
+ | </ | ||
If the installation was not successful, please go through the section [[https:// | If the installation was not successful, please go through the section [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | **In the end, please check whether the installation was successful: Try to show the help message executing the following command:** | ||
+ | |||
+ | < | ||
+ | |||
+ | If the help message appears, the installation seems to be successful. Please download also the data before the webinar - the instruction follows. | ||
==== Download data ==== | ==== Download data ==== | ||
Line 36: | Line 52: | ||
* Merged diffraction data up to 1.9 Å - // | * Merged diffraction data up to 1.9 Å - // | ||
* Unmerged diffraction data up to 1.9 Å - // | * Unmerged diffraction data up to 1.9 Å - // | ||
+ | |||
+ | **If you have installed //PAIREF// and extract the data, you are ready for the webinar.** :-) | ||
==== Open console in working directory ==== | ==== Open console in working directory ==== | ||
Open terminal (GNU/Linux, macOS) or CCP4 console (Windows) and go to the folder where your structure model and diffraction data are saved. For example, if you saved those three files to folder '' | Open terminal (GNU/Linux, macOS) or CCP4 console (Windows) and go to the folder where your structure model and diffraction data are saved. For example, if you saved those three files to folder '' | ||
- | |||
- | |||
==== Run PAIREF in command line ==== | ==== Run PAIREF in command line ==== | ||
- | We will add three high-resolution shells step by step: 2.3-2.10 Å, 2.1-2.0 Å and 2.0-1.9 Å. Run //PAIREF//: < | + | We will add three high-resolution shells step by step: 2.3-2.10 Å, 2.1-2.0 Å and 2.0-1.9 Å. Run //PAIREF//: < |
Note: The structure model was refined using X-ray weight 0.06, we have to keep this setting to gain unbiased results. | Note: The structure model was refined using X-ray weight 0.06, we have to keep this setting to gain unbiased results. | ||
Line 57: | Line 73: | ||
The first thing that should be checked is whether the refinements have converged. Scroll at the very bottom of page, here you can see plots of Rwork and Rfree vs. refinement cycle. We can conclude that all the refinements have converged. | The first thing that should be checked is whether the refinements have converged. Scroll at the very bottom of page, here you can see plots of Rwork and Rfree vs. refinement cycle. We can conclude that all the refinements have converged. | ||
- | Rfree decreased after the addition of shells 2.3-2.10 Å and 2.1-2.0 Å. | + | Rfree decreased after the addition of shells 2.3-2.10 Å and 2.1-2.0 Å: |
{{ : | {{ : | ||
- | Since a perfect model gives an R value of 0.42 against random data (i.e. pure noise) – assuming non-tNCS (translational non-crystallographic symmetry) data from a non-twinned crystal ((Evans, P. R. & Murshudov, G. N. (2013). Acta Cryst. D69, 1204-1214.)) – a higher R value in the (current) high-resolution shell indicates either the involvement of high-resolution data without information content (the data are even worse than noise), or poor quality of the model, or the presence of tNCS. This is indicated for the shell 2.0-1.9 Å. | + | Since a perfect model gives an R-value of 0.42 against random data (i.e. pure noise) – assuming non-tNCS (translational non-crystallographic symmetry) data from a non-twinned crystal ((Evans, P. R. & Murshudov, G. N. (2013). Acta Cryst. D69, 1204-1214.)) – a higher R-value in the (current) high-resolution shell indicates either the involvement of high-resolution data without information content (the data are even worse than noise), or poor quality of the model, or the presence of tNCS. This is indicated for the shell 2.0-1.9 Å. |
{{ : | {{ : | ||
- | CC* is higher than CCwork in whole resolution range (except the shell 2.0-1.9 Å where CC* is undefined due to negative CC1/ | + | CC* a model-independent measure of noise is in the diffraction data. CC* is higher than CCwork in whole resolution range (except the shell 2.0-1.9 Å where CC* is undefined due to negative CC1/ |
{{ : | {{ : | ||
Line 80: | Line 96: | ||
07 2.10 | 07 2.10 | ||
08 2.00 | 08 2.00 | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Contact ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | In case of any questions or problems, please do not hesitate and write us: [[martin.maly@fjfi.cvut.cz]]. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Further reading ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | * [[https:// | ||
+ | * More information about //PAIREF// settings and possibilities are explained in the [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Linking crystallographic model and data quality. P.A. Karplus & K. Diederichs (2012) Science 336: | ||
+ | * Assessing and maximizing data quality in macromolecular crystallography. P.A. Karplus & K. Diederichs (2015) Cur. Op. in Str. Biology 34:60–68 | ||
+ | * Better models by discarding data? P.A. Karplus & K. Diederichs (2013) Acta Cryst. D59: | ||
+ |